You are here: Home Modules Working at Court II: conditions of production
Personal tools

HABSBURGER QUIZ

ONLINE TICKETS

 

Working at Court II: conditions of production


Modulinformation
(obligatorisch)
16233
True
1
save
Working at Court II: conditions of production
(übernommen)
Angabe des Autors nach dem Muster: Martin Müller
11391
True
1
save
Julia Teresa Friehs
(obligatorisch)
Kurzangabe der wichtigsten Daten / Anrisstext
16232
True
1
save
On taking up employment at court, an artist was admitted into the ‘court family’, although he remained equivalent in status to a craftsman. What were his actual conditions of work like?
Textangaben
16234
True
1
save

Wage books and seating orders lumped artists together with barbers, tailors, cooks, musicians and dwarves. They thus occupied a subordinate position at court. However, there were many possibilities of improving one’s position. Rudolf II’s ‘personal painter’ Hans von Aachen virtually assumed the role of an ambassador, and later on Peter Paul Rubens was also entrusted with similar missions. Court artists such as these were well received at foreign courts when on their travels, and were regarded as highly influential.

These artists had a special position at court, but the taint of the parvenu attached to them, and they were subject to the envy and ill will of other court employees and their fellow-artists.

On joining the imperial household they received free clothing, board and lodging or were given a corresponding sum of money. Some of them had houses outside the court placed at their disposal and were able to keep away from the daily routine of the court. A special and much sought-after form of employment was that of ‘supplier to the court’: the latter lived in the city and was not obliged to be present at the court, but was nevertheless a court employee.

Artists were paid by the hour, the day or the week. The most coveted forms of payment were annual salaries, which could be commuted into a lifelong pension, or secured with grants of land or houses as well as additional sums of money. However, court artists had no legitimate claim to a pension, as these were only a ‘favour’ granted by the prince. Their salaries varied greatly, and on the death of a prince the position had to be confirmed by his successor.

When a prince ran out of money, court artists were frequently compelled to work for other courts or patrician patrons from the upper-middle classes. Artists mostly owned the rights to their paintings, as they were paid for their readiness to provide their work as and when required, not for the works themselves, but the prince could grant himself a right of pre-emption or ‘option to purchase’. When a regulation of this kind obtained, the sale of individual works offered a welcome source of additional income. Artists could also present a work as a gift to their patron and receive a gift in return, mostly in the form of money.

Medien
(übernommen)
Dem Inhalt zugeordnete Bildergalerie
49
True
1
ignore
(übernommen)
Ein Video
50
True
1
ignore
(übernommen)
Abbildung eines historischen Quellendokuments
51
True
1
ignore
Zitate
(übernommen)
Legen Sie hier ein Textzitat ab
222
True
1
ignore
Weitere Informationen
(übernommen)
11393
True
1
save
Warnke, Martin: Hofkünstler. Zur Vorgeschichte des modernen Künstlers, 2. Aufl., Köln 1996, 9–14, 79–98, 142–217; Prag um 1600. Kunst und Kultur am Hofe Kaiser Rudolfs II., Bd. 1, Katalog zur gleichnamigen Ausstellung, Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien, 24.11.1988–26.2.1989, Freren 1988, 217, Kat.Nr. 99;
Attributszuweisungen
(übernommen)
Weise Attribute zu
-1
True
1
save
Zeitliche Einordnung
(übernommen)
Linken Sie hier bitte zu einem Zeitraum.
Beschlagwortung
(übernommen)
Ordnen Sie der Story themtische Schlagwörter zu
-1
True
1
save
Bild Hans von Aachen: Archduchess Anna (1585–1618), daughter of Archduke Ferdinand II, ruler of Tyrol, wife of Emperor Matthias, 1604
 
Document Actions
Navigation